Hi
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Emil Renner Berthing syst...@esmil.dk wrote:
On 19 September 2014 22:19, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Emil Renner Berthing syst...@esmil.dk
wrote:
Don't rely on __WORDSIZE, but just standard LONG_MAX
and
Don't rely on __WORDSIZE, but just standard LONG_MAX
and INT_MAX from limits.h.
---
src/shared/util.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/util.h b/src/shared/util.h
index 08d556f..00068c6 100644
--- a/src/shared/util.h
+++ b/src/shared/util.h
@@ -205,7
Hi
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Emil Renner Berthing syst...@esmil.dk wrote:
Don't rely on __WORDSIZE, but just standard LONG_MAX
and INT_MAX from limits.h.
Why? The commit message lacks any explanation of that change.
Thanks
David
---
src/shared/util.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
On 19 September 2014 22:19, David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Emil Renner Berthing syst...@esmil.dk
wrote:
Don't rely on __WORDSIZE, but just standard LONG_MAX
and INT_MAX from limits.h.
Why? The commit message lacks any explanation of that change.