On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 01:21:10PM +0100, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
>> I was a bit unsure what to do here. We can be waiting for multiple
>> jobs that each can fail. We could return an error on the first failure
>> but then we
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 01:21:10PM +0100, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
> I was a bit unsure what to do here. We can be waiting for multiple
> jobs that each can fail. We could return an error on the first failure
> but then we would not call log_error for the remaining issues. The
> question is then
I was a bit unsure what to do here. We can be waiting for multiple
jobs that each can fail. We could return an error on the first failure
but then we would not call log_error for the remaining issues. The
question is then what to return in the case of multiple errors? With
this patch (and the behav
From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen
wait_for_jobs was ignoring the errors from the jobs stored in r.
It would only ever return whether the call to sd_bus_remove_filter
went ok. This patch changes it to return the last job related error
encountered. The result of the cleanup call to sd_bus_remove
