On 07/13/2012 03:59 PM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752774
---
man/systemctl.xml | 33 +++-
src/shared/install.c | 78 +---
src/shared/unit-name.c | 12
src/shared/unit-na
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752774
---
man/systemctl.xml | 33 +++-
src/shared/install.c | 78 +---
src/shared/unit-name.c | 12
src/shared/unit-name.h |1 +
4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 24
On Thu, 12.07.12 16:00, Michal Sekletar (msekl...@redhat.com) wrote:
> +template = unit_name_template(info->name);
> +if (!template) {
> +free(path);
> +r
I had assumed this was already possible. +1
--
David Strauss
| da...@davidstrauss.net
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Michal Sekletar wrote:
> so I've submitted fixed version. It's slightly modified according to
> your comments. Enabling and disabling unit file which is named the same
> as instance should work seamlessly now.
> I also updated manpages, if you have any concerns abo
Hi Lennart,
so I've submitted fixed version. It's slightly modified according to
your comments. Enabling and disabling unit file which is named the same
as instance should work seamlessly now.
I also updated manpages, if you have any concerns about manpage
explanation or code itself, feel free to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752774
---
man/systemctl.xml | 33 +
src/shared/install.c | 93 ++--
src/shared/unit-name.c | 12 +++
src/shared/unit-name.h |1 +
4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 24 del
