Michael Biebl wrote on 04/02/15 19:59:
2015-02-04 13:42 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Hello all,
a little while ago, Jon Severinsson wrote a sysv generator
optimization to not go through all the parsing of init.d scripts and
creation of units if there already is a
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson [2015-02-04 22:36 +]:
I expect Debian to do the same sane thing as everyone else did back in the
day and strike out that components will be allowed to migrate to units
[...]
Then next thing the Debian community will realize is that once maintainers
have made the
Hello all,
a little while ago, Jon Severinsson wrote a sysv generator
optimization to not go through all the parsing of init.d scripts and
creation of units if there already is a native unit for that name. As
they are put into generator.late they would be ignored anyway.
This is particularly
2015-02-04 13:42 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
Hello all,
a little while ago, Jon Severinsson wrote a sysv generator
optimization to not go through all the parsing of init.d scripts and
creation of units if there already is a native unit for that name. As
they are put
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 15:06 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv script, and the latter is
enabled, but the former not, then systemd currently reads
On Wed, 04.02.15 21:26, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 15:06 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv script, and
On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 22:02 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 21:26, Uoti Urpala (uoti.urp...@pp1.inet.fi) wrote:
Isn't this change also relevant to the creation of .wants symlinks, and
avoiding generating .wants links from the wrong targets?
As in, the case where you
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:06, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv script, and the latter is
enabled, but the former not, then
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:01, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:06, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
drop in a unit
On 02/04/2015 09:20 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 22:01, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Wed, 04.02.15 15:06, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hey,
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far
On Wed, 04.02.15 10:08, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote:
Hello all,
a little while ago, Jon Severinsson wrote a sysv generator
optimization to not go through all the parsing of init.d scripts and
creation of units if there already is a native unit for that name. As
they are put
Hey,
Lennart Poettering [2015-02-04 13:42 +0100]:
Well, but their enablement status so far is not ignored. i.e. if you
drop in a unit file, as well as a sysv script, and the latter is
enabled, but the former not, then systemd currently reads that so that
the sysv one is overriden by the
12 matches
Mail list logo
