On 22.09.2014 11:48, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
This patch changes the naming scheme for sas disks. The original names used
disk's sas address and lun, the new scheme uses sas address of the
nearest expander (if available) and a phy id of the used connection.
If no expander is used, the phy id
On 09/25/2014 05:07 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/24/2014 05:03 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
Simple as: Don't add new features to systemd/udev, only fix bugs.
The by-path has been part of udev for a long time, the users of this
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Tomas Henzl the...@redhat.com wrote:
I haven't noticed a single one technical reason why the by-path should be
moved out
from udev and not fixed there when it's needed and most importantly how that
move
would help the users of this feature.
Because it was
On 09/24/2014 05:03 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
- Original Message -
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 01:55:09PM -0400, Kay Sievers wrote:
- Original Message -
We are not applying this patch now. It introduces a complete new
scheme and we do not want to extend the current SCSI code, we only
Dne 23.9.2014 v 19:55 Kay Sievers napsal(a):
- Original Message -
We are not applying this patch now. It introduces a complete new
scheme and we do not want to extend the current SCSI code, we only
fix obvious bugs.
Fine with me, however not sure what our story should be for years to
- Original Message -
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 01:55:09PM -0400, Kay Sievers wrote:
- Original Message -
We are not applying this patch now. It introduces a complete new
scheme and we do not want to extend the current SCSI code, we only
fix obvious bugs.
Fine
- Original Message -
Dne 23.9.2014 v 19:55 Kay Sievers napsal(a):
- Original Message -
We are not applying this patch now. It introduces a complete new
scheme and we do not want to extend the current SCSI code, we only
fix obvious bugs.
Fine with me, however not sure
Dne 24.9.2014 v 17:06 Kay Sievers napsal(a):
- Original Message -
Dne 23.9.2014 v 19:55 Kay Sievers napsal(a):
- Original Message -
We are not applying this patch now. It introduces a complete new
scheme and we do not want to extend the current SCSI code, we only
fix obvious
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 16:58 +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Hi Maurizio,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Maurizio Lombardi mlomb...@redhat.com
wrote:
This patch changes the naming scheme for sas disks. The original names used
disk's sas address and lun, the new scheme uses sas address of
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:33:54PM +0200, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 16:58 +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Hi Maurizio,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Maurizio Lombardi mlomb...@redhat.com
wrote:
This patch changes the naming scheme for sas disks. The original
- Original Message -
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:33:54PM +0200, Maurizio Lombardi wrote:
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 16:58 +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Hi Maurizio,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Maurizio Lombardi mlomb...@redhat.com
wrote:
This patch changes the naming
- Original Message -
We are not applying this patch now. It introduces a complete new
scheme and we do not want to extend the current SCSI code, we only
fix obvious bugs.
Fine with me, however not sure what our story should be for years to come
regarding SCSI stuff downstream.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 01:55:09PM -0400, Kay Sievers wrote:
- Original Message -
We are not applying this patch now. It introduces a complete new
scheme and we do not want to extend the current SCSI code, we only
fix obvious bugs.
Fine with me, however not sure what our
This patch changes the naming scheme for sas disks. The original names used
disk's sas address and lun, the new scheme uses sas address of the
nearest expander (if available) and a phy id of the used connection.
If no expander is used, the phy id of hba phy is used.
Note that names that refer to
Hi Maurizio,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Maurizio Lombardi mlomb...@redhat.com wrote:
This patch changes the naming scheme for sas disks. The original names used
disk's sas address and lun, the new scheme uses sas address of the
nearest expander (if available) and a phy id of the used
On 22/09/14 17:58, Tom Gundersen wrote:
Hi Maurizio,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Maurizio Lombardi mlomb...@redhat.com
wrote:
This patch changes the naming scheme for sas disks. The original names used
disk's sas address and lun, the new scheme uses sas address of the
nearest
16 matches
Mail list logo
