Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] units: Make getty@.service install rule generic.

2013-03-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 13.02.13 11:01, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote: The same could be said of any templated unit with a WantedBy= section I guess. One idea off the top of my head is to have a NoInstanceAlias= directive, but adding a new verb here seems fugly. I actually like the

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] units: Make getty@.service install rule generic.

2013-02-13 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 13/02/13 03:13 did gyre and gimble: On Wed, 06.02.13 09:47, Colin Guthrie (co...@mageia.org) wrote: The getty@.service used to specifically enable a getty@tty1.service under getty.target when enabled. Modern versions of systemd allow commands such

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] units: Make getty@.service install rule generic.

2013-02-13 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Thomas Bächler at 13/02/13 10:01 did gyre and gimble: Am 13.02.2013 10:29, schrieb Colin Guthrie: Hmm, but what happens then if people do run systemctl enable getty@.service? In my eyes, doing this always seemed wrong, I wouldn't mind if it returned an error. Yeah, I'm

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] units: Make getty@.service install rule generic.

2013-02-06 Thread Colin Guthrie
The getty@.service used to specifically enable a getty@tty1.service under getty.target when enabled. Modern versions of systemd allow commands such as: systemctl enable getty@tty2.service which automatically create the correct symlink if the Install rule permits it. This changes the default