Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Coverity fixes

2014-10-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 10.09.14 13:51, Philippe De Swert (philippedesw...@gmail.com) wrote: > Ok so it has been taken into use and can actually somehow be considered part > of > the coding style? The mail was still speculating about it and I could not > quickly see a confirmation of this. Yes, it is the codin

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Coverity fixes

2014-09-16 Thread Philippe De Swert
Hi Thomas, On 16/09/14 08:56, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote: >> Yesterday I finally got to revive the systemd Coverity project on >> scan.coverity.org Unfortunately to see the errors reported you need >> to sign up, but I will make sure to approve requests for seeing the >> "bugs" whenever they show

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Coverity fixes

2014-09-15 Thread Thomas H.P. Andersen
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:20 AM, wrote: > From: Philippe De Swert > > Hi, > > Yesterday I finally got to revive the systemd Coverity project on > scan.coverity.org Unfortunately to see the errors reported you need > to sign up, but I will make sure to approve requests for seeing the > "bugs" wh

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Coverity fixes

2014-09-10 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Philippe De Swert wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/09/14 13:30, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Philippe De Swert >>> On a side note I noticed this mail : >>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.systemd.devel/6248 >>> >>> Talking about

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Coverity fixes

2014-09-10 Thread Philippe De Swert
Hi, On 10/09/14 13:30, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Philippe De Swert >> On a side note I noticed this mail : >> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.systemd.devel/6248 >> >> Talking about some freeing macros. I noticed there seem to be some >> here and ther

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Coverity fixes

2014-09-10 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Philippe De Swert wrote: > > Hi, > > On 10/09/14 13:12, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at > 11:20 AM, wrote: > >> Yesterday I finally got to revive the systemd Coverity project on > >> scan.coverity.org Unfortunately to see the errors reported

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Coverity fixes

2014-09-10 Thread Philippe De Swert
Hi, On 10/09/14 13:12, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:20 AM, wrote: >> Yesterday I finally got to revive the systemd Coverity project on >> scan.coverity.org Unfortunately to see the errors reported you need >> to sign up, but I will make sure to approve requests for see

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Coverity fixes

2014-09-10 Thread Thomas H.P. Andersen
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:20 AM, wrote: > From: Philippe De Swert > > Hi, > > Yesterday I finally got to revive the systemd Coverity project on > scan.coverity.org Unfortunately to see the errors reported you need > to sign up, but I will make sure to approve requests for seeing the > "bugs" wh

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Coverity fixes

2014-09-10 Thread philippedeswert
From: Philippe De Swert Hi, Yesterday I finally got to revive the systemd Coverity project on scan.coverity.org Unfortunately to see the errors reported you need to sign up, but I will make sure to approve requests for seeing the "bugs" whenever they show up. Also I quickly made some quick fixe