Hi,
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 07:12:13PM +0100, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 08:01:04PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > On 06/20/2014 07:28 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > > On 06/20/2014 06:50 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> > >> Use the db->entries_hash to access the policy db entries inst
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 08:01:04PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 06/20/2014 07:28 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > On 06/20/2014 06:50 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> >> Use the db->entries_hash to access the policy db entries instead of the
> >> db->send_access_hash which is just a cache for send entries.
On 06/20/2014 07:28 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 06/20/2014 06:50 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
>> Use the db->entries_hash to access the policy db entries instead of the
>> db->send_access_hash which is just a cache for send entries.
Ah, you're purging the other entries in patch #12. Alright then, now
On 06/20/2014 06:50 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
> Use the db->entries_hash to access the policy db entries instead of the
> db->send_access_hash which is just a cache for send entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni
> ---
> policy.c | 7 ---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Use the db->entries_hash to access the policy db entries instead of the
db->send_access_hash which is just a cache for send entries.
Signed-off-by: Djalal Harouni
---
policy.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/policy.c b/policy.c
index bf49f68..79d6fa4 10
