From: Michael Stapelberg mich...@stapelberg.de
But enable it by default in make install and systemd preset.
---
Makefile.am | 4 ++--
system-preset/90-systemd.preset | 1 +
units/tmp.mount | 3 +++
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Jon Severinsson j...@severinsson.net wrote:
From: Michael Stapelberg mich...@stapelberg.de
But enable it by default in make install and systemd preset.
tmp.mount is part of our default expected setup and should behave like
this by default without any presets
tmp.mount is part of our default expected setup and should behave like
this by default without any presets or configuration.
Which is why I made `make install` enable it, which wasn't in the original
patch for Debian.
It can be overridden by an entry in fstab just fine. Why is that needed?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:51:13PM +0200, Jon Severinsson wrote:
tmp.mount is part of our default expected setup and should behave like
this by default without any presets or configuration.
Which is why I
On Wed, 16.07.14 13:51, Jon Severinsson (j...@severinsson.net) wrote:
tmp.mount is part of our default expected setup and should behave like
this by default without any presets or configuration.
Which is why I made `make install` enable it, which wasn't in the original
patch for
]] Lennart Poettering
(Also I see little point in /tmp not being a tmpfs anyway. If you want a
lot of space there, then use swap -- of which you can have up to 2G even
on 32bit systems. tmpfs on on swap has the great benefit that it
relieves the kernel from always having to utimately flush
On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 20:22 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Lennart Poettering
(Also I see little point in /tmp not being a tmpfs anyway. If you want a
lot of space there, then use swap -- of which you can have up to 2G even
on 32bit systems. tmpfs on on swap has the great benefit that
2014-07-16 16:59 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net:
THis wouldn't work the way you might expect. RequiresMountsFor=
I don't think we actually have a unit which has
RequiresMountsFor=tmp.mount and if there was, I would consider that
broken.
--
Why is it that all of the
