On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:49:22PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
On 08/20/2014 06:16 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:15:35AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
Hmm, I'm not convinced this buys us anything really. After all, that
struct has a single user only, and factoring out
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:15:35AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
Hi Djalal,
Thanks for applying the others.
On 08/19/2014 03:43 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
Some creds can be gathered during kdbus_meta_append() instead of
kdbus_conn_queue_alloc() where they will be gathered for all the
On 08/20/2014 06:16 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 09:15:35AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
Hmm, I'm not convinced this buys us anything really. After all, that
struct has a single user only, and factoring out these fields doesn't
necessarily lead to more readability.
Hmm with
Hi Djalal,
On 08/19/2014 03:43 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote:
Some creds can be gathered during kdbus_meta_append() instead of
kdbus_conn_queue_alloc() where they will be gathered for all the
receivers and saved into each receivers queue before installing
on the slices.
By moving to
Some creds can be gathered during kdbus_meta_append() instead of
kdbus_conn_queue_alloc() where they will be gathered for all the
receivers and saved into each receivers queue before installing
on the slices.
By moving to kdbus_meta_append() it permits to do it only one time
for all the
