On 07/18/2013 06:10 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:46:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 16.07.13 17:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:39:54PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 28.06.13
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 01:05:25PM +0200, Jan Janssen wrote:
On 07/18/2013 06:10 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:46:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 16.07.13 17:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:46:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 16.07.13 17:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:39:54PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 28.06.13 17:26, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote:
Applied
On Fri, 28.06.13 17:26, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote:
Unfortunately, order of sd_journal_enumerate_unique() is
undefined, so we have to sort the boot IDs. For that we
seach for any log entry with a specific boot ID and then
use the realtime stamp to order everything.
---
Hi,
I
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:39:54PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 28.06.13 17:26, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote:
Applied this one now. If people start complaining about its speed we can
reinvestigate and do find some way for optimization...
We need to think about negative
