]] Lennart Poettering
| If systemctl preset is passed with unit names, those units would
| be enable/disabled as listed in the preset file. If no argument is
| passed all units would be reset to the preset defaults. (another
| long-sought feature...)
I'd like this to be systemctl preset --all
On Thu, 07.07.11 10:14, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote:
Heya,
| Anyway, this of course requires some buy-in from the distributions, so
| I'd like to ask the distro maintainers for comments on this. Do you
| think this would be useful to you? Any other suggestions, ideas?
Debian
Lennart Poettering wrote:
snip
disable avahi-daemon.service
enable cups.service
disable *
/snip
I suppose evaluation stops as soon as an entry matches. So as Distro
we could have e.g 99-default disable * as default policy.
- The RPM post macro would always call systemctl preset for the
Kay Sievers wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 00:42, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
wrote:
On Wed, 06.07.11 00:26, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote:
If systemctl preset is passed with unit names, those units would
be enable/disabled as listed in the preset file. If no
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:42:25 +0200 Lennart Poettering wrote:
Actually, I do want a way how people can reset all service enable
states to what the vendor intended. And that should be systemctl
preset without arguments I believe.
That would be too easy to run accidentally.
They can run:
cd
Le mardi 05 juillet 2011 à 21:21 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
Heya,
many of you probably saw Frederic's rpm macros suggested here. This got
Kay and me thinking about implementing something like presets in
systemd, and before we go and implement that we'd like to hear your
opinions on
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 21:21:03 Lennart Poettering wrote:
Heya,
many of you probably saw Frederic's rpm macros suggested here. This got
Kay and me thinking about implementing something like presets in
systemd, and before we go and implement that we'd like to hear your
opinions on it.
On Wed, 06.07.11 10:34, Frederic Crozat (fcro...@suse.com) wrote:
Le mardi 05 juillet 2011 à 21:21 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
Heya,
many of you probably saw Frederic's rpm macros suggested here. This got
Kay and me thinking about implementing something like presets in
Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com) said:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:42:25 +0200 Lennart Poettering wrote:
Actually, I do want a way how people can reset all service enable
states to what the vendor intended. And that should be systemctl
preset without arguments I believe.
That would be too
hi..
On 07/06/11 16:25, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 06.07.11 01:07, Marius Tolzmann (tolzm...@molgen.mpg.de) wrote:
i am just afraid that someday 'systemctl preset' will break my setup
even if a havn't defined 'enable/disable *' anywhere.
Yes, it's a dangerous tool, but I think
On Wed, 06.07.11 10:31, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote:
Michal Schmidt (mschm...@redhat.com) said:
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:42:25 +0200 Lennart Poettering wrote:
Actually, I do want a way how people can reset all service enable
states to what the vendor intended. And that
Heya,
many of you probably saw Frederic's rpm macros suggested here. This got
Kay and me thinking about implementing something like presets in
systemd, and before we go and implement that we'd like to hear your
opinions on it. This would go hand in hand with Frederic's macros, and
both would be
On Wed, 06.07.11 00:51, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 00:42, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
wrote:
On Wed, 06.07.11 00:26, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote:
If systemctl preset is passed with unit names, those units would
be
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 01:07, Marius Tolzmann tolzm...@molgen.mpg.de wrote:
On 06.07.2011 00:51, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 00:42, Lennart Poetteringlenn...@poettering.net
wrote:
We will require an argument. There will no 'change all services'
logic.
Uh?
Actually, I do
14 matches
Mail list logo
