On Thu, 18.09.14 15:24, Emil Renner Berthing (syst...@esmil.dk) wrote:
What's the rationale here? The GNU version of basename() appears a lot
more useful than the POSIX. I am find with switching to the POSIX
version of libc calls if both have more or less equivalent
functionality or they are used
---
src/core/execute.c | 6 +++---
src/core/load-fragment.c| 2 +-
src/core/manager.c | 2 +-
src/core/unit.c | 4 ++--
src/delta/delta.c | 14 +++---
src/journal/journalctl.c| 2 +-
This needs a bit more explanation. Why this change?
Cheers,
Tom
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Emil Renner Berthing syst...@esmil.dk wrote:
---
src/core/execute.c | 6 +++---
src/core/load-fragment.c| 2 +-
src/core/manager.c | 2 +-
El 18/09/14 a las #4, Emil Renner Berthing escribió:
---
And all of this because the POSIX versions of basename modify the
argument .. see the problem ? it is the standard versions that are wrong.
what about implementing a gnu_basename in the C library and using that
instead ?
--
Cristian
I
