Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured

On 16/08/21 7:46 pm, Michael Biebl wrote: How exactly do you rename your interfaces? Do you use a udev rule? Can you post those scripts/rules? I had already posted this in PS of my first email. It is two step process. Here it is again: Little about tmpeth* naming. Some old scripts that we

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured

How exactly do you rename your interfaces? Do you use a udev rule? Can you post those scripts/rules?

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured

On 16/08/21 5:09 pm, Ulrich Windl wrote: Hi! Actually I wonder (even before the upgrade) what that nonsense is about: eth1: Interface name change detected, eth1 has been renamed to eth0. No. If you see two journal logs that I posted. This message was not coming before upgrade. Issue seems

[systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Upgraded multiple systems to systemd 249.3 and all had eth1 not started / configured

Hi! Actually I wonder (even before the upgrade) what that nonsense is about: eth1: Interface name change detected, eth1 has been renamed to eth0. Regards, Ulrich >>> Amish schrieb am 16.08.2021 um 12:39 in Nachricht <83597df0-fef1-049e-3707-2aa2a3819...@gmail.com>: > Hello everyone, > > So I