Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Q; syslog.socket dependency

2021-03-12 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Michael Chapman schrieb am 12.03.2021 um 11:27 in Nachricht : > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote: > [...] >> > Can you think of a better way of wording the documentation? >> >> It depends: Do you consider /dev/log to be a "syslog socket"? >> (I'm not running rsyslog there) > > I'm no

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Q; syslog.socket dependency

2021-03-12 Thread Michael Chapman
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote: [...] > > Can you think of a better way of wording the documentation? > > It depends: Do you consider /dev/log to be a "syslog socket"? > (I'm not running rsyslog there) I'm not quite sure what you mean. If where you're going is "well *obviously* syslog.

[systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] Re: Q; syslog.socket dependency

2021-03-12 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Michael Chapman schrieb am 12.03.2021 um 08:59 in Nachricht <90c9a861-f8cd-88d7-647-c6cc2a8ad...@very.puzzling.org>: > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021, Ulrich Windl wrote: >> >>> Reindl Harald schrieb am 11.03.2021 um 16:23 in >> Nachricht <4422087b-9966-e7fb-66ad-4157d83f2...@thelounge.net>: >> >> > >