Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.07.19 um 11:53 schrieb Ulrich Windl: > I agree that the major problem with systemd was that distributions switched 3 > or 5 years too early to it. guess where you would be now without them solving most fo the problems over the past years for people coming like you late to the party guess

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.07.19 um 08:37 schrieb Ulrich Windl: > The really annoying thing with systemd is that if SOMETHING fails during boot, > the complete boot is aborted and you are put into an emergency shell. this is not true there are very rare cases where you end in the emergency shell > with the fact

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> František Šumšal schrieb am 03.07.2019 um 11:01 in Nachricht : [...] > Honestly, I'm kind of impressed you stamp the "bad bad systemd" phrase all > over > the place several times in your emails, yet you still expect people to be > able > to (willingly) help you. I may have an opinion,

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread František Šumšal
On 7/3/19 8:37 AM, Ulrich Windl wrote: František Šumšal schrieb am 02.07.2019 um 18:51 in > Nachricht : > >> >> On 7/2/19 4:36 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >>> Am Di., 2. Juli 2019 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Paul Menzel >>> : Reading the output above, I can see, why the people contact this

[systemd-devel] Antw: Re: systemd-devel listed as support confuses users (was: connection failure)

2019-07-03 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> František Šumšal schrieb am 02.07.2019 um 18:51 in Nachricht : > > On 7/2/19 4:36 PM, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am Di., 2. Juli 2019 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Paul Menzel >> : >>> Reading the output above, I can see, why the people contact this mailing >>> list. >> >> I agree here. While we do