Re: [systemd-devel] Breaking ordering cycles... a suggestion.

2012-05-17 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Kay Sievers at 17/05/12 15:18 did gyre and gimble: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: I know this has been discussed a lot but it's still showing up for me on occasion, especially with 3rd party non-LSB init scripts. My suggestion

Re: [systemd-devel] Breaking ordering cycles... a suggestion.

2012-05-17 Thread Michael Biebl
2012/5/17 Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie wrote: I know this has been discussed a lot but it's still showing up for me on occasion, especially with 3rd party non-LSB init scripts. My suggestion would be to prioritise the jobs that

Re: [systemd-devel] Breaking ordering cycles... a suggestion.

2012-05-17 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Michael Biebl We've seen this quite often on Debian, too, due to sysv init scripts doing interesting stuff, like being both started in rcS.d and rc2.d. This should have been fixed in e51db373c242b7541794affb2b5e411bcce26d0f. More logic to handle non-sensical cases would be good. We should