Thank you for that thorough explanation, much appreciated!
Cheers,
Conrad
On 6/25/19 11:14 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 24.06.19 16:41, Conrad Hoffmann (c...@bitfehler.net) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> TL;DR: I was wondering what happens if a unit executed early during the
>> boot process
On Mo, 24.06.19 16:41, Conrad Hoffmann (c...@bitfehler.net) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TL;DR: I was wondering what happens if a unit executed early during the
> boot process changes the current dependency graph by either enabling or
> even starting another unit that was previously disabled. Is this defined
On 6/24/19 7:53 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 24.06.2019 17:41, Conrad Hoffmann пишет:
>> Hi,
>>
>> TL;DR: I was wondering what happens if a unit executed early during the
>> boot process changes the current dependency graph by either enabling or
>> even starting another unit that was previously
24.06.2019 17:41, Conrad Hoffmann пишет:
> Hi,
>
> TL;DR: I was wondering what happens if a unit executed early during the
> boot process changes the current dependency graph by either enabling or
> even starting another unit that was previously disabled. Is this defined
> behaviour, and if so
Hi,
TL;DR: I was wondering what happens if a unit executed early during the
boot process changes the current dependency graph by either enabling or
even starting another unit that was previously disabled. Is this defined
behaviour, and if so what are the rules?
Longer version:
I am looking at
