Re: [systemd-devel] FDE: UEFI/Secureboot solves main part / missing link is /boot encryption

2021-09-29 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 29.09.21 12:47, Leon Fauster (leonfaus...@googlemail.com) wrote: > > Encryption is not authentication. > > > > Not sure why you would encrypt your boot loader though? The boot > > loader code is hardly a secret, is it? It's the same for everyone and > > open source. > > > > And with which

Re: [systemd-devel] FDE: UEFI/Secureboot solves main part / missing link is /boot encryption

2021-09-29 Thread Leon Fauster
On 28.09.21 23:13, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Di, 28.09.21 19:44, Leon Fauster (leonfaus...@googlemail.com) wrote: Hallo Lennart, corresponding to your last post about FDE: On an EFI system - would an encrypted "/boot" or /boot on an encrypted "/" filesystem eliminate the mentioned main

[systemd-devel] FDE: UEFI/Secureboot solves main part / missing link is /boot encryption

2021-09-28 Thread Leon Fauster
Hallo Lennart, corresponding to your last post about FDE: On an EFI system - would an encrypted "/boot" or /boot on an encrypted "/" filesystem eliminate the mentioned main attack vector? The whole chain would be authenticated. firmware->shim->bootloader/grub2->{manual

Re: [systemd-devel] FDE: UEFI/Secureboot solves main part / missing link is /boot encryption

2021-09-28 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Di, 28.09.21 19:44, Leon Fauster (leonfaus...@googlemail.com) wrote: > Hallo Lennart, corresponding to your last post about FDE: > > On an EFI system - would an encrypted "/boot" or /boot on > an encrypted "/" filesystem eliminate the mentioned main > attack vector? The whole chain would be