On Tue, 05.02.13 12:42, Dave (d...@flex.com.au) wrote:
In the year 2013, of the month of February, on the 4th day, Larry Baker
wrote:
What about 2012-02~4 (leave off the -)? Thus, - implies day (days
from the start) of the month, ~ implies days from the end of the month.
Nice. I
On Tue, 05.02.13 11:54, David Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
Repeating myself, but I'll say it again: I strongly prefer a feature
set that is a subset of iCal/xCal [1]. I'd like it to be possible in
the future to expose existing and future runs via CalDAV over
something like the
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
We are very conservative in adding new deps to PID 1. PID 1 is an almost
kernel-like environment, if it goes down the entire system is
lost. Pulling in another library into this, that so far has not been
part of
Here is a version that is tested and, with review, I think ready to
commit. This adds a unit test to exercise the next event logic,
to/from string wrappers, and validity checks.
This represents a near superset of existing scheduling. For example:
* FREQ=minutely will execute every minute,
Oh, one other current limitation is that it doesn't let you specify a
time zone since the code just uses the current time (effectively in
UTC) for DTSTART. We could support actual time zones if necessary by
having an additional field like TimeZone= that gets passed into the
next event calculation.
Repeating myself, but I'll say it again: I strongly prefer a feature
set that is a subset of iCal/xCal [1]. I'd like it to be possible in
the future to expose existing and future runs via CalDAV over
something like the gateway.
iCal already supports last day of month schedules:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:54 AM, David Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net wrote:
Repeating myself, but I'll say it again: I strongly prefer a feature
set that is a subset of iCal/xCal [1].
Here's a better exposition of the richness of RRULE:
Is there interest in a patch? It looks like adding Recurrence= to
timer units to support iCal RECUR format would be trivial.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:15 PM, David Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net wrote:
Is there interest in a patch? It looks like adding Recurrence= to
timer units to support iCal RECUR format would be trivial.
I'm personally not too excited about supporting a full embedded
language for timers. :)
Many
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
Many of the things in iCal we *really* don't want or need, like the
re-occurrence counters we would need to store and we likely don't want
that kind of state, the time zones which I think we should entirely
ignore for a system
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 06:48:23PM -0800, David Strauss wrote:
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote:
Many of the things in iCal we *really* don't want or need, like the
re-occurrence counters we would need to store and we likely don't want
that kind of state, the
I haven't tested this other than ensuring that it compiles with iCal
support (default) and with --disable-ical.
I opted for putting the modularity into which sources get compiled,
like the gateway, which necessarily requires some #ifdefs in the timer
code. I could also put the modularity into the
On Thu, 31.01.13 00:07, Dave (d...@flex.com.au) wrote:
Hi. I'm not on the maillist, but I recently read that systemd was planning
to introduce an integrated job scheduler, if it isn't done already.
If so, then it would be very handy to introduce a way to run scheduled jobs
at the end of
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:47:05PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 31.01.13 00:07, Dave (d...@flex.com.au) wrote:
Hi. I'm not on the maillist, but I recently read that systemd was planning
to introduce an integrated job scheduler, if it isn't done already.
If so, then it
On 4 Feb 2013, at 4:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Suggestions what we could do instead?
2012-02-:4 maybe?
2012-02-~4?
This one looks nice.
What about 2012-02~4 (leave off the -)? Thus, - implies day (days from
the start) of the month, ~ implies days from the end of the
In the year 2013, of the month of February, on the 4th day, Larry Baker wrote:
What about 2012-02~4 (leave off the -)? Thus, - implies day (days
from the start) of the month, ~ implies days from the end of the month.
Nice. I like this one. Simple, neat, and feels right. The tilde is
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Dave d...@flex.com.au wrote:
In the year 2013, of the month of February, on the 4th day, Larry Baker
wrote:
What about 2012-02~4 (leave off the -)? Thus, - implies day (days
from the start) of the month, ~ implies days from the end of the month.
Nice. I
17 matches
Mail list logo
