[systemd-devel] Have timers fire after boot is complete

2012-09-27 Thread Christian Seiler
Hello, one of the most-requested features that is not present in systemd currently is a true rc.local-type functionality that runs after all other services. I haven't read all past discussions, but from what I've gathered the main objection from the systemd developers is that having a catch-all

Re: [systemd-devel] Have timers fire after boot is complete

2012-09-27 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/27/2012 08:33 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: one of the most-requested features that is not present in systemd currently is a true rc.local-type functionality that runs after all other services. Any particular reason why those user just dont create type oneshot unit then order it as they

Re: [systemd-devel] Have timers fire after boot is complete

2012-09-27 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le jeudi 27 septembre 2012 à 11:07 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson a écrit : On 09/27/2012 08:33 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: one of the most-requested features that is not present in systemd currently is a true rc.local-type functionality that runs after all other services. Any particular

Re: [systemd-devel] Have timers fire after boot is complete

2012-09-27 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 27.09.2012 13:07, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: On 09/27/2012 08:33 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: one of the most-requested features that is not present in systemd currently is a true rc.local-type functionality that runs after all other services. Any particular reason why those user

Re: [systemd-devel] Have timers fire after boot is complete

2012-09-27 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 27.09.2012 12:07, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson: On 09/27/2012 08:33 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: one of the most-requested features that is not present in systemd currently is a true rc.local-type functionality that runs after all other services. Any particular reason why those user just

Re: [systemd-devel] Have timers fire after boot is complete

2012-09-27 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Christian Seiler at 27/09/12 09:33 did gyre and gimble: Hello, one of the most-requested features that is not present in systemd currently is a true rc.local-type functionality that runs after all other services. I haven't read all past discussions, but from what I've

Re: [systemd-devel] Have timers fire after boot is complete

2012-09-27 Thread Christian Seiler
I haven't read all past discussions, but from what I've gathered the main objection from the systemd developers is that having a catch-all After=* dependency would not be the sane thing to do. Can you just use a Type=idle unit? From man systemd.service: Behavior of idle is very similar to

Re: [systemd-devel] Have timers fire after boot is complete

2012-09-27 Thread Christian Seiler
If you want to run a script in the very end of everything you simply order it after the default target as in [Unit] Description=My custom script After=default.target [Service] Type=oneshot ExecStart=/path/to/my/custom/script [Install] WantedBy=default.target Hmmm, I remember vaguely that

Re: [systemd-devel] Have timers fire after boot is complete

2012-09-27 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/27/2012 11:17 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote: Le jeudi 27 septembre 2012 à 11:07 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson a écrit : On 09/27/2012 08:33 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: one of the most-requested features that is not present in systemd currently is a true rc.local-type functionality that runs

Re: [systemd-devel] Have timers fire after boot is complete

2012-09-27 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le jeudi 27 septembre 2012 à 12:55 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson a écrit : On 09/27/2012 11:17 AM, Frederic Crozat wrote: Le jeudi 27 septembre 2012 à 11:07 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson a écrit : On 09/27/2012 08:33 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: one of the most-requested features that is not

Re: [systemd-devel] Have timers fire after boot is complete

2012-09-27 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 01:43:34PM +0100, Christian Seiler wrote: The problem here is that a Type=idle service is basically a type=simple service and you might want to have Type=forking or Type=oneshot services which you want to start. Maybe sometimes like: [Service] Type=idle