Thanks for your answer. Turns out this problem is not really about LVM.
I've described the more general problem here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85746
I don't know if that's expected or not, but I'd like to have some clearings
if I'm doing something that I shouldn't do or not.
A
On Tue, 28.10.14 23:51, Luca Bruno (lethalma...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi, I'm going on with my work to have systemd in initrd on NixOS (using
> dracut is a little complicated at the moment).
> Everything works fine, I've ported luks and lvm and both work separately.
> However I'm hitting a problem w
Sorry for the spam. Further tracking down the issue. I think I've come to a
conclusion of the scenario:
S1.service requires/after D.device and S2.service
S1 is activating, thus starts D and S2
S2 starts, which activates D and deactivates D
A "can" now start because D has no job running [1], but D
I've tracked down the issue a little.
sysroot.mount requires/after dev-vg-lv.device.
System start, dev-vg-lv is inactive.
vgchange -a y -> dev-vg-lv active.
vgchange -a n -> dev-vg-lv inactive.
At this point, unit->job of dev-vg-lv is NULL (sometimes also happens when
I don't run vgchange, but I
Hi, I'm going on with my work to have systemd in initrd on NixOS (using
dracut is a little complicated at the moment).
Everything works fine, I've ported luks and lvm and both work separately.
However I'm hitting a problem when using luks and lvm on top of luks.
SETUP
Software: systemd 212, lvm 2
