Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-29 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 26.10.12 18:39, Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com) wrote: My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible. Almost every upgrade problem I've had in Fedora has been related to systemd's

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-29 Thread Michael H. Warfield
Lennart, I'm going to quickly top post here so forgive me for being rude. Serge and I worked out some patches that seem to address the devtmpfs issues nicely. Still got a few oddities to iron out but the big fundamental one got fixed and is working. Many thanks for that. The problem with

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:39:33PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed, 24

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Kay Sievers
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: sent too quickly.. On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: BTW...

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Oleksii Shevchuk
Ok fine... So I get logged in and I run this... [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service network.service - LSB: Bring up/down networking Loaded: loaded (/etc/rc.d/init.d/network) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:23:07 +0400; 1min 57s

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:04:42AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: sent too quickly.. On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: On Fri,

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 13:01 +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:04:42AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: sent too quickly..

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 08:20:51AM -0400, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 10:03 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:39:33PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Jon Stanley
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: Excuse me? I'm a kernel maintainer and a member of the Samba team. I have dedicated almost 2 decades to promoting and developing several dozen open source projects I will not enumerate here. I don't know or

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Oleksii Shevchuk
Odd, the oldest systemd version I have around is 38, and even that has a working journal that catches stdout/stderr of services. There is some problem with systemctl status and stderr/stdout: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55320 This leads to such behavior: cat

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:01:36PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Kay, Olav, I think that we're being a bit unfair towards Michael. There's an implication that his posts were offensive, but they weren't. Overly verbose, yes, repetitive, yes, agitated, etc, but not intended as rude.

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 17:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:01:36PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Kay, Olav, I think that we're being a bit unfair towards Michael. There's an implication that his posts were offensive, but they weren't. Overly verbose, yes,

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-27 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:59:21AM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 10:05 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 06:39:33PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: [root@alcove mhw]# systemctl status network.service network.service - LSB:

[systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible. Almost every upgrade problem I've had in Fedora has been related to systemd's failure to provide comprehendable error messages to things like errors in fstab

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible. Almost every upgrade problem I've had in Fedora has been related to

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 27.10.2012 01:51, schrieb Kok: Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:23:07 +0400; 1min 57s ago hmm, EXIT CODE failure. It exited with a non-zero status. Process: 91 ExecStart=/etc/rc.d/init.d/network start (code=exited, status=209/STDOUT)

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and obfuscating errors in ways that makes debugging almost impossible. Almost every

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 20:06 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: My most fundamental problem with systemd is its insistence in hiding and obfuscating

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: It's still failing and it's giving me conflicting errors about directory already exists and then file does not exist (on the directory). This POS is driving me nuts with lack of intelligent debugging information!

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Kok, Auke-jan H
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: This should help. Obviously, journalctl should help you a lot as well. And journalctl gave me jack shit trying to figure this out and I really DON'T need

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 18:32 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: This should help. Obviously, journalctl should help you a lot as well. And journalctl gave

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 21:50 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 18:32 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 16:51 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: This should help.

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 22:05 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 21:50 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 18:32 -0700, Kok, Auke-jan H wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Michael H. Warfield m...@wittsend.com wrote: On Fri, 2012-10-26 at

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Olav Vitters
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: BTW... Not to drop names (which I'm about to do) or anything and I know in a big organization not everybody knows everyone but... I prefer judging myself. And at the moment I see you using words like: - crap - POS --

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Olav Vitters
sent too quickly.. On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: BTW... Not to drop names (which I'm about to do) or anything and I know in a big organization not everybody knows everyone but... I prefer

Re: [systemd-devel] One of my fundamental problems with systemd...

2012-10-26 Thread Michael H. Warfield
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 05:24 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: sent too quickly.. On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 05:22:30AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:16:47PM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: BTW... Not to drop names (which I'm about to do) or anything and I know in a big