Re: [systemd-devel] Possible systemd segfault switching from 216 to 219 in fedora upgrade

2015-04-22 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 13.03.15 17:59, Will Woods (wwo...@redhat.com) wrote: (Warming up this rally old thread again, sorry for not responding more timely) http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/SystemUpdates/ systemd has been implementing this for quite a while, at least for all systems

Re: [systemd-devel] Possible systemd segfault switching from 216 to 219 in fedora upgrade

2015-03-14 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:38:33 -0600 Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com пишет: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Will Woods wwo...@redhat.com wrote: I don't really like the new-old-new switchroot stuff, but I haven't got a better solution at the moment. But: if we could use something like

Re: [systemd-devel] Possible systemd segfault switching from 216 to 219 in fedora upgrade

2015-03-09 Thread James Hogarth
On 8 March 2015 at 22:32, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Thu, 05.03.15 22:07, James Hogarth (james.hoga...@gmail.com) wrote: Tried to put together a reduced testcase via a yum installroot style container to switch-root into to see what that behaviour is like and do see

Re: [systemd-devel] Possible systemd segfault switching from 216 to 219 in fedora upgrade

2015-03-08 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 05.03.15 22:07, James Hogarth (james.hoga...@gmail.com) wrote: Tried to put together a reduced testcase via a yum installroot style container to switch-root into to see what that behaviour is like and do see a segfault - not certain if this is the same being seen during the fedup

Re: [systemd-devel] Possible systemd segfault switching from 216 to 219 in fedora upgrade

2015-03-05 Thread James Hogarth
On 5 March 2015 at 17:07, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote: On 5 March 2015 at 15:10, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: Right before switch rooting systemd will kill all remaining processes of the initrd, including the strace, hence the strace logs aren't that

Re: [systemd-devel] Possible systemd segfault switching from 216 to 219 in fedora upgrade

2015-03-05 Thread James Hogarth
On 5 March 2015 at 15:10, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: Right before switch rooting systemd will kill all remaining processes of the initrd, including the strace, hence the strace logs aren't that useful either, they end before the transition. Please boot with

[systemd-devel] Possible systemd segfault switching from 216 to 219 in fedora upgrade

2015-03-05 Thread James Hogarth
Hi, I spent some time last night trying to track down the issue preventing fedup from fedora 21 to 22: https://bugzilla.redhat.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185604 I'm pretty sure I've tracked it down to when switch-root is called and systemd-219 gets executed being passed the serialised state of

Re: [systemd-devel] Possible systemd segfault switching from 216 to 219 in fedora upgrade

2015-03-05 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 05.03.15 13:52, James Hogarth (james.hoga...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi, I spent some time last night trying to track down the issue preventing fedup from fedora 21 to 22: https://bugzilla.redhat.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1185604 I'm pretty sure I've tracked it down to when switch-root is