Op 14 feb. 2014, om 19:16 heeft Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org het
volgende geschreven:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 02:30:00PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 14/02/14 13:32, Richard Purdie escribió:
Both conditions are checked, can you find out why the second seems to
fail too, it
Hi,
I work on the Yocto Project and we've been having some stability issues
with systemd based images on our automated testing infrastructure. We
default to the last released version but it appears there have been a
lot of changes in master so I tried the latest git master in the hope
that this
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
systemd[1]: Expecting device dev-ttyS0.device...
Expecting device dev-ttyS0.device...
systemd[1]: job_get_timeout dev-ttyS0.device 1/96903843
0/18446744073709551615 - 1/96903843
[* ] A
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 16:47 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
systemd[1]: Expecting device dev-ttyS0.device...
Expecting device dev-ttyS0.device...
systemd[1]: job_get_timeout dev-ttyS0.device
El 14/02/14 13:32, Richard Purdie escribió:
Both conditions are checked, can you find out why the second seems to
fail too, it shouldn't?
CONFIG_FHANDLE is in your kernel?
No, it wasn't. I enabled that and that image started working better,
thanks!
I believe we should throw a big fat
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 02:30:00PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 14/02/14 13:32, Richard Purdie escribió:
Both conditions are checked, can you find out why the second seems to
fail too, it shouldn't?
CONFIG_FHANDLE is in your kernel?
No, it wasn't. I enabled that and that image
