Re: [systemd-devel] Q: Reducing the output of systemctl status

2019-05-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 15.05.19 08:49, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote: > Hi! > > First, is it a well-known bug that "--quitet" seems to be ignored for > "systemctl status"? It's the only command where --quiet makes sense IMHO, but > it seems to have no effect in v228. "systemctl status"

[systemd-devel] Q: Reducing the output of systemctl status

2019-05-15 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! First, is it a well-known bug that "--quitet" seems to be ignored for "systemctl status"? It's the only command where --quiet makes sense IMHO, but it seems to have no effect in v228. Also, considering this example output: --- ● iotwatch@LOC1.service - iotwatch I/O performance monitor