Re: [systemd-devel] Reason for setting runqueue to IDLE priority and side effects if this is changed?

2015-07-27 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 15.07.15 17:30, Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2) (mho...@de.adit-jv.com) wrote: Systemd v211 added the running queue as deferred event source to the event handling with priority IDLE. So dbus requests are preferred over job execution. The reverse order effect is simply because the run queue

Re: [systemd-devel] Reason for setting runqueue to IDLE priority and side effects if this is changed?

2015-07-17 Thread Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2)
Up to v206, the behavior of systemd was the following one: -- - the starter sends out a start request of a bench of applications (he requests a sequence of unit starts) If you want to control order of execution yourself, why do

Re: [systemd-devel] Reason for setting runqueue to IDLE priority and side effects if this is changed?

2015-07-16 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:30:53 + Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2) mho...@de.adit-jv.com пишет: Hi all, jumping from systemd 206 to systemd 211 we were faced with some issue, which are finally caused by a changed main loop priority of the job execution. Our use case is the following one:

[systemd-devel] Reason for setting runqueue to IDLE priority and side effects if this is changed?

2015-07-15 Thread Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2)
Hi all, jumping from systemd 206 to systemd 211 we were faced with some issue, which are finally caused by a changed main loop priority of the job execution. Our use case is the following one: -- While we are starting up the system, a so called application