On Sun, 22.02.15 14:56, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
For info I am attaching a diff with the changes so far: 1309 includes
removed out of the current 7707. It is only compile and make
check-tested. I am only looking for comments (and perhaps compile
testing on an
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Sun, 22.02.15 14:56, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
For info I am attaching a diff with the changes so far: 1309 includes
removed out of the current 7707. It is only compile and make
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Sat, 07.02.15 10:29, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at ways to automatically trim the
On Wed, 11.02.15 23:46, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 11.02.15 01:40, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
Yep. Makes sense.
Here is a status on what I have done so
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 11.02.15 01:40, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
Yep. Makes sense.
Here is a status on what I have done so far.
include-what-you-want does the following:
1) sorts the includes
2) adds
On Wed, 11.02.15 01:40, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
Yep. Makes sense.
Here is a status on what I have done so far.
include-what-you-want does the following:
1) sorts the includes
2) adds missing headers for any symbols used
3) adds forward declarations
4) removes any
On Mon, 09.02.15 10:19, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
include-what-you-use is actually pretty nice. It is also a little bit
crazy. It wants to include everything directly and we would add a lot
includes for errno.h, string.h, stdlib.h, stdbool.h, stddef.h, etc etc
everywhere.
On Sat, 07.02.15 10:29, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi,
I am looking at ways to automatically trim the unnecessary includes.
One way to do it is a script[1] which simply tests if the compile
still works after removing each include one at a time. It does this in
reverse
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Mon, 09.02.15 10:19, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote:
include-what-you-use is actually pretty nice. It is also a little bit
crazy. It wants to include everything directly and we would add a lot
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Thomas H.P. Andersen pho...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Ronny Chevalier
chevalier.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-07 14:05 GMT+01:00 Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net:
On 07/02/15 10:29, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
I am looking at ways to
On 07/02/15 10:29, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
I am looking at ways to automatically trim the unnecessary includes.
One way to do it is a script[1] which simply tests if the compile
still works after removing each include one at a time. It does this in
reverse order for all includes in the .c
2015-02-07 14:05 GMT+01:00 Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net:
On 07/02/15 10:29, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
I am looking at ways to automatically trim the unnecessary includes.
One way to do it is a script[1] which simply tests if the compile
still works after removing each include one at a
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Ronny Chevalier
chevalier.ro...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-07 14:05 GMT+01:00 Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net:
On 07/02/15 10:29, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
I am looking at ways to automatically trim the unnecessary includes.
One way to do it is a script[1]
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
On 07/02/15 10:29, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
I am looking at ways to automatically trim the unnecessary includes.
One way to do it is a script[1] which simply tests if the compile
still works after removing each
14 matches
Mail list logo
