"Oester Jonas (CM-AI/PJ-CF31)" writes:
>> For a while, I was rather unhappy with the boot times I was seeing,
>> but after changing CONFIG_HZ from 100 to 1000, that changed
>> dramatically.
>
> ...
>
>> There is also a rather peculiar delay between the startup of several
>> services (dev-mqueue.m
> For a while, I was rather unhappy with the boot times I was seeing,
> but after changing CONFIG_HZ from 100 to 1000, that changed
> dramatically.
...
> There is also a rather peculiar delay between the startup of several
> services (dev-mqueue.mount, systemd-random-seed-load.service, etc)
> wh
"Kok, Auke-jan H" writes:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Henrik Grindal Bakken wrote:
>>
>> The kernel boot time seems pretty long there, but that's partly due to
>> a fairly long (intentional) delay in initramfs.
>
> You'll get a much fuller picture if you use github.com/sofar/bootchart and
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Henrik Grindal Bakken wrote:
>
> Hi. I'm setting up a systemd system with a Linux-from-scratch-ish
> distro on a multi-core platform.
>
> For a while, I was rather unhappy with the boot times I was seeing,
> but after changing CONFIG_HZ from 100 to 1000, that chang
Hi. I'm setting up a systemd system with a Linux-from-scratch-ish
distro on a multi-core platform.
For a while, I was rather unhappy with the boot times I was seeing,
but after changing CONFIG_HZ from 100 to 1000, that changed
dramatically.
My userspace components (i.e. systemd + my scripts and