On Fri, 19.10.12 00:01, Dan Tihelka (dtihe...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> Hello,
> thank you for such a long and detailed answer. I do agree with you in general.
>
> Of course, there is an intersection of two words. On one side there is an
> init
> daemon being responsible for starting/stopping serv
Hello,
thank you for such a long and detailed answer. I do agree with you in general.
Of course, there is an intersection of two words. On one side there is an init
daemon being responsible for starting/stopping services. On the second side
there is an network management system/daemon handling t
On Sun, 14.10.12 16:15, Dan Tihelka (dtihe...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hallo,
> just a short question, sorry if it seems "stupid", I am just curious. And
> google does not provide satisfactory answers (or I didn't ask the right
> question)
>
> So:
> is there a robust and reliable way of starting/sto
Hallo,
just a short question, sorry if it seems "stupid", I am just curious. And
google does not provide satisfactory answers (or I didn't ask the right
question)
So:
is there a robust and reliable way of starting/stopping a service when a net
connection is established/lost? And I mean also th
