[systemd-devel] Systemd-boot not properly loading device tree, when loaded by U-boot (ARM64, tested on RK3399)

2021-09-17 Thread Qu Wenruo
Hi, I'm recently testing booting my RK3399 boards with the following boot sequence: U-boot -> systemd-boot (EFI payload) -> kernel Which provides much more flex than plain extlinux conf from U-boot. (More choice, easier to write config, runtime kernel change). So far "kernel" and "initramfs"

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd-boot not properly loading device tree, when loaded by U-boot (ARM64, tested on RK3399)

2021-09-17 Thread Qu Wenruo
On 2021/9/17 19:45, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fr, 17.09.21 19:25, Qu Wenruo (w...@suse.com) wrote: Hi, I'm recently testing booting my RK3399 boards with the following boot sequence: U-boot -> systemd-boot (EFI payload) -> kernel Which provides much more flex than plain extlinux conf

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd-boot not properly loading device tree, when loaded by U-boot (ARM64, tested on RK3399)

2021-09-17 Thread Qu Wenruo
On 2021/9/17 19:45, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fr, 17.09.21 19:25, Qu Wenruo (w...@suse.com) wrote: Hi, I'm recently testing booting my RK3399 boards with the following boot sequence: U-boot -> systemd-boot (EFI payload) -> kernel Which provides much more flex than plain extlinux conf

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd-boot not properly loading device tree, when loaded by U-boot (ARM64, tested on RK3399)

2021-09-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fr, 17.09.21 19:25, Qu Wenruo (w...@suse.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm recently testing booting my RK3399 boards with the following boot > sequence: > > U-boot -> systemd-boot (EFI payload) -> kernel > > Which provides much more flex than plain extlinux conf from U-boot. > (More choice, easier to