Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-16 Thread Ludwig Nussel
Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 15.11.10 16:50, Ludwig Nussel (ludwig.nus...@suse.de) wrote: Fixed this now. Ideally Debian/Ubuntu would stop renaming agetty like this, or at least do it via symlink only. I'd love to get rid of the differences between the distros here. Why is

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 16.11.10 09:36, Ludwig Nussel (ludwig.nus...@suse.de) wrote: Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 15.11.10 16:50, Ludwig Nussel (ludwig.nus...@suse.de) wrote: Fixed this now. Ideally Debian/Ubuntu would stop renaming agetty like this, or at least do it via symlink only. I'd

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-16 Thread Ludwig Nussel
Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 16.11.10 09:36, Ludwig Nussel (ludwig.nus...@suse.de) wrote: Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 15.11.10 16:50, Ludwig Nussel (ludwig.nus...@suse.de) wrote: Fixed this now. Ideally Debian/Ubuntu would stop renaming agetty like this, or at least

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-15 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Ludwig Nussel ludwig.nus...@suse.de wrote: Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 11.11.10 14:06, Andreas Jaeger (a...@novell.com) wrote: On Thursday 11 November 2010 12:50:44 Kay Sievers wrote: [...] Anyway, the point of this was only to have getty start

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-15 Thread Ludwig Nussel
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Ludwig Nussel ludwig.nus...@suse.de wrote: Lennart Poettering wrote: [...] I am really not a big fan of Suse's $ALL extension. Making SuSEfirewall2 run last via $ALL mostly is a boot speed optimization. The filtering

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-15 Thread Ludwig Nussel
Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 03.11.10 22:49, Andrew Edmunds (andrew.edmu...@yahoo.com.au) wrote: A few points about these two source files. 1. ge...@.service.m4 has: m4_ifdef(`TARGET_FEDORA', `m4_define(`GETTY', `/sbin/agetty 38400')')m4_dnl m4_ifdef(`TARGET_SUSE',

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 15.11.10 16:50, Ludwig Nussel (ludwig.nus...@suse.de) wrote: Fixed this now. Ideally Debian/Ubuntu would stop renaming agetty like this, or at least do it via symlink only. I'd love to get rid of the differences between the distros here. Why is the (a)getty service file part of

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-14 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Kay Sievers | /etc/rc.local should not be in the default setup, it's legacy only | some distros did, and it does not make much sense in the systemd | context, especially not to run an empty shell script. :) It's less legacy and more «stuff lazy sysadmins put there». From my own boxes I have

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-14 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Kay Sievers | On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 19:49, Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@err.no wrote: | ]] Kay Sievers | | | /etc/rc.local should not be in the default setup, it's legacy only | | some distros did, and it does not make much sense in the systemd | | context, especially not to run an empty

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-12 Thread Kay Sievers
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 20:08, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Thu, 11.11.10 12:50, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote: Anyway, the point of this was only to have getty start late(ish) in the boot process, after most of the other services that are pulled in by

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-12 Thread Kay Sievers
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 03:19, LaMont Jones lam...@debian.org wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:49:11PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: We can ask, but it has been that way for at least a decade so I'm guessing it's unlikely to be changed now. See this Debian bug from 2001, marked wontfix.

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-11 Thread Kay Sievers
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 00:37, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Wed, 03.11.10 22:49, Andrew Edmunds (andrew.edmu...@yahoo.com.au) wrote: A few points about these two source files. 1. ge...@.service.m4 has: m4_ifdef(`TARGET_FEDORA', `m4_define(`GETTY', `/sbin/agetty

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-11 Thread Kay Sievers
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:39, Andrew Edmunds andrew.edmu...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Kay Sievers wrote: Michael, any chance to check if it's possible to avoid the mangling of common util-linux tool names, and get a symlink in Debian package? After that we can drop the ifdef stuff here. We can

Re: [systemd-devel] ge...@.service.m4 and serial-ge...@.service.m4

2010-11-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 11.11.10 12:50, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote: Anyway, the point of this was only to have getty start late(ish) in the boot process, after most of the other services that are pulled in by multi-user.target. Maybe there is a better way to specify this, if not everyone