Re: [systemd-devel] journald reliability

2012-10-23 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 19.10.12 00:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > I think the only real way to solve this cleanly is to extend the kernel > > to provide SCM_CREDENTIAL and SCM_SECURITY-like auxiliary messages that > > carries the information we need. More specifically I am hoping

Re: [systemd-devel] journald reliability

2012-10-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:02:28PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 18.10.12 16:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > But systemd has/had this information and could be queried for it. So I > > propose to add a cache of recently dead PIDs in systemd, that could be

Re: [systemd-devel] journald reliability

2012-10-18 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 18.10.12 16:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > Hi, > > I've been playing with journald and journalctl, and have a few > thoughts about making the logs more reliable. > > First problem: it would be nice to tie more messages from systemd to > units, i.e. use more

[systemd-devel] journald reliability

2012-10-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi, I've been playing with journald and journalctl, and have a few thoughts about making the logs more reliable. First problem: it would be nice to tie more messages from systemd to units, i.e. use more structured logging. I'll follow up with a patch which does that, and I'm wondering if this is