Re: [systemd-devel] kdbus vs. pipe based ipc performance

2014-04-15 Thread Stefan Westerfeld
Hi! On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 05:36:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Stefan Westerfeld ste...@space.twc.de wrote: First of

[systemd-devel] kdbus vs. pipe based ipc performance

2014-03-03 Thread Stefan Westerfeld
Hi! First of all: I'd really like to see kdbus being used as a general purpose IPC layer; so that developers working on client-/server software will no longer need to create their own homemade IPC by using primitives like sockets or similar. Now kdbus is advertised as high performance IPC

Re: [systemd-devel] kdbus vs. pipe based ipc performance

2014-03-03 Thread Kay Sievers
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Stefan Westerfeld ste...@space.twc.de wrote: First of all: I'd really like to see kdbus being used as a general purpose IPC layer; so that developers working on client-/server software will no longer need to create their own homemade IPC by using primitives like

Re: [systemd-devel] kdbus vs. pipe based ipc performance

2014-03-03 Thread Kay Sievers
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Stefan Westerfeld ste...@space.twc.de wrote: First of all: I'd really like to see kdbus being used as a general purpose IPC layer; so that developers working on client-/server software will no

Re: [systemd-devel] kdbus vs. pipe based ipc performance

2014-03-03 Thread Kay Sievers
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Kay Sievers k...@vrfy.org wrote: On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Stefan Westerfeld ste...@space.twc.de wrote: First of all: I'd really like to see kdbus being used as a general purpose IPC