On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:18:37PM +0100, Max wrote:
> 23.02.2015 13:29, Lennart Poettering пишет:
> > On Mon, 23.02.15 11:30, Max (maxim.sur...@campus.tu-berlin.de) wrote:
> >
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> I've got question partially inspired by recent posts to this ML from some
> >> troll
> >> without shif
23.02.2015 13:29, Lennart Poettering пишет:
> On Mon, 23.02.15 11:30, Max (maxim.sur...@campus.tu-berlin.de) wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I've got question partially inspired by recent posts to this ML from some
>> troll
>> without shift on his keyboard :)
>>
>> It's been mentioned that calls like sd_lis
On Mon, 23.02.15 11:30, Max (maxim.sur...@campus.tu-berlin.de) wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've got question partially inspired by recent posts to this ML from some
> troll
> without shift on his keyboard :)
>
> It's been mentioned that calls like sd_listen_fds(0) and others become NOOP
> when
> socket a
Hi.
I've got question partially inspired by recent posts to this ML from some troll
without shift on his keyboard :)
It's been mentioned that calls like sd_listen_fds(0) and others become NOOP when
socket activation is not available due to lack of systemd. Which is fine but
leads to
rather infla
