I don't want this work to get buried. Where are we on the revisions
suggested by Zbyszek?
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 02:05:27PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 23/02/13 00:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 07:10:45PM -0800, David Strauss wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:59 PM, David Strauss da...@davidstrauss.net wrote:
I don't want this work to get buried. Where are we on the revisions
suggested by Zbyszek?
Hi David,
just to wrap this up, I think that the only
On 23/02/13 00:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:46:35PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 21/02/13 01:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've pushed a few more commits.
I've pushed a few
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 02:05:27PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 23/02/13 00:43, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:46:35PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 21/02/13 01:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steven
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:46:35PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 21/02/13 01:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've pushed a few more commits.
I've pushed a few commits to
On 21/02/13 01:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've pushed a few more commits.
I've pushed a few commits to
https://github.com/keszybz/systemd/commits/python-systemd-reader
This is your tree but rebased onto my id128
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 09:02:56PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've pushed a few more commits.
I've pushed a few commits to
https://github.com/keszybz/systemd/commits/python-systemd-reader
This is your tree but rebased onto my id128 stuff, and modified
to use it. It also has sphinx-generated
On 19/02/13 07:05, David Strauss wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Steven Hiscocks
steven-syst...@hiscocks.me.uk wrote:
Sounds good. I suppose `log_level` should become `add_loglevel_matches` for
consistency. (or actually `add_priority_matches`?)
Log level is the Pythonic language;
On 18/02/13 02:17, David Strauss wrote:
Great progress!
Thanks, and thank you for your feedback.
A few more remarks:
* Class methods ought to be verbs. this_machine and this_boot are
the key ones that come to mind. Maybe add_machine_match and
add_boot_match?
Sounds good. I suppose
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Steven Hiscocks
steven-syst...@hiscocks.me.uk wrote:
Sounds good. I suppose `log_level` should become `add_loglevel_matches` for
consistency. (or actually `add_priority_matches`?)
Log level is the Pythonic language; please continue using it. The
journal itself
Great progress!
A few more remarks:
* Class methods ought to be verbs. this_machine and this_boot are
the key ones that come to mind. Maybe add_machine_match and
add_boot_match?
* In methods like this_machine that have special handling for the
None value as myself, the function should use
On 11/02/13 05:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:20:57PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I thought the easiest way was to just inherit the Journal (now
_Journal), replacing __new__ with all the python RunString stuff.
On Sun, 03.02.13 21:18, Steven Hiscocks (steven-syst...@hiscocks.me.uk) wrote:
Hi,
I've been developing a python module for accessing the journal,
using the journal API. (https://github.com/kwirk/pyjournalctl)
One issue I've had is with 'sd_journal_seek_monotonic_usec'. When
called,
On Mon, 04.02.13 18:30, Steven Hiscocks (steven-syst...@hiscocks.me.uk) wrote:
So if I understand correctly, a _BOOT_ID match must be in place for
sd_journal_seek_monotonic_usec to function correctly?
No really, it should suffice to just pass the valid boot id to
_seek_monotonic(). Are you
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 10:20:57PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I thought the easiest way was to just inherit the Journal (now
_Journal), replacing __new__ with all the python RunString stuff.
https://github.com/kwirk/systemd/commit/9003fdbc69577840ab6a1501a1c49f7377b6124d
Hi Steven,
On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 03:19:03PM -0800, David Strauss wrote:
Can we spend some time on IRC prepping the systemd patch? I'd like to
get that rolling.
Hi David,
I pushed an updated version of [1], with uuid.UUID all over. Please
have a look.
Zbyszek
[1]
On 06/02/13 00:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:51:48PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 06/02/13 00:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven
On 08/02/13 20:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:51:48PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 06/02/13 00:55, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:45:10PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
What about renaming Journalctl to Journal? It doesn't really control anything
:)
Neither does the actual journalctl. :-)
But, systemd's naming convention is to call first-tier shell utilities
somethingctl and
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've made the suggested changes and pushed it to github. Feedback
welcomed :)
Thanks!
Some more thoughts on the API below. Some of those are probably
stupid, but I want
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've made the suggested changes and pushed it to github. Feedback
welcomed :)
Thanks!
Some more
On 05/02/13 23:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 09:22:46PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 05/02/13 02:49, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've made the suggested changes and pushed it to
On 04/02/13 05:13, David Strauss wrote:
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
Hi,
I've been
On 04/02/13 18:30, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
On 04/02/13 05:13, David Strauss wrote:
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:42:02PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
I've made the suggested changes and pushed it to github. Feedback
welcomed :)
Thanks!
Some more thoughts on the API below. Some of those are probably
stupid, but I want to throw them out in the open, for your feedback.
Hi,
I've been developing a python module for accessing the journal, using
the journal API. (https://github.com/kwirk/pyjournalctl)
One issue I've had is with 'sd_journal_seek_monotonic_usec'. When
called, followed by call to 'sd_journal_next', I end up at the start of
the journal.
If I set
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
Hi,
I've been developing a python module for accessing the journal,
using the journal API. (https://github.com/kwirk/pyjournalctl)
Great! Have you thought about including it in the systemd repo,
once interface nad implementation
I second the interest in committing this to the existing Python
support once polished.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 09:18:28PM +, Steven Hiscocks wrote:
Hi,
I've been developing a python module for accessing
29 matches
Mail list logo