yes, i think it would be great to have a single library supporting all the
systemd features, and perhaps at some point i can donate the dbus-systemd
code to such a project (not that there's much to it, just a thin
systemd-specific layer on top of the great ruby-dbus work), but so far as
i'm aware,
For what it's worth, I try to encourage projects to identify their bindings
as simply for systemd, even if the journal support is the first (and only)
set of APIs available. It's just so easy to support the other APIs once the
journal is already supported, and daemons that want to use the journal
s
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 02:48:07PM +, Nathan Williams wrote:
> Hello Zbyszek,
>
> Thanks for your reply :)
>
> From looking at the systemd-journal gem, I'd say they're complementary:
> systemd-journal is entirely about interacting with the journal, and
> dbus-systemd is focused squarely on sy
You asked on irc about adding https://github.com/nathwill/ruby-dbus-systemd
to the wiki. We can do that, but I'd like to clarify first the relationship
to https://github.com/ledbettj/systemd-journal. Is it a replacement,
complement, etc? What is the development status of your package: stable,
exper
