On Do, 23.05.19 11:56, Stanislav Angelovič (angelovi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> Sorry for a bit late reply, I've been quite busy recently.
>
> > So we could readd the ability to create a bus message with a NULL bus,
> > but I am a bit concerned that people then always pass NULL which
Hi Lennart,
Sorry for a bit late reply, I've been quite busy recently.
> So we could readd the ability to create a bus message with a NULL bus,
> but I am a bit concerned that people then always pass NULL which might
> ultimately result in constant remarshalling if the message is
> eventually
On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 10:38:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On So, 12.05.19 13:06, Stanislav Angelovič (angelovi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Quick question: Would it be possible to extend sd-bus to also allow
> > creating messages without requiring a bus?
>
> This used to be available but we
On So, 12.05.19 13:06, Stanislav Angelovič (angelovi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi (Lennart :)
>
> Quick question: Would it be possible to extend sd-bus to also allow
> creating messages without requiring a bus?
This used to be available but we dropped it, since the serialization
depends on the bus
Hi (Lennart :)
Quick question: Would it be possible to extend sd-bus to also allow
creating messages without requiring a bus?
Let me explain: Currently, if we want to create any message in sd-bus, we
need a valid bus pointer. That might make perfect sense for messages that
come from or will
