On Fr, 19.01.18 17:41, Simon McVittie (s...@collabora.com) wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 at 17:22:51 +, philip is hungry wrote:
> > however if i run the forkme function (to put process in the background) it
> > behaves as follows:
> >
> > Jan 18 15:06:25 thinkpad waitonly[11228]: Return from f
Alternatively, NotifyAccess= in [Service allows other processes to ping
the watchdog, but Simon is right...
forking is not needed for systemd.
On 19/01/2018 18:41, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 at 17:22:51 +, philip is hungry wrote:
however if i run the forkme function (to put
On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 at 17:22:51 +, philip is hungry wrote:
> however if i run the forkme function (to put process in the background) it
> behaves as follows:
>
> Jan 18 15:06:25 thinkpad waitonly[11228]: Return from forkme = 11228
> Jan 18 15:06:25 thinkpad waitonly[11228]: Return from lockme
I am trying to use "sd_watchdog_enabled". If I run my service without forking,
the sd_watchdog_enabled function works as expected:
Jan 18 15:05:29 thinkpad systemd[1]: Starting WaitonlyServer...
Jan 18 15:05:30 thinkpad waitonly[11172]: PID before fork = 11172
Jan 18 15:05:30 thinkpad waitonly[
