Hi Lennart,
2014-05-22 9:59 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> Please test!
Thanks for looking into this.
Since the commits can not be cherry-picked for v204 and v208 (which
I'm currently running in Debian), I can't easily test.
So this will have to wait until I've upgraded to a newer version.
Wit
On Thu, 27.03.14 05:18, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2/ If a socket is in such a state, we probably shouldn't process
> incoming requests and try to start the service
> 3/ Should we stop the socket if the Load state is "error"
So far we kept the load state and the active state quite
On Thu, 27.03.14 05:18, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> There is an interesting bug which can be used to crash systemd via a
> dangling symlink. For details please see [0].
>
> To trigger the bug, you need a socket activated service. I'm using
> cups in this case.
>
> The steps to repr
Filed this as https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76899
Would be great to have someone look at it.
Having systemd crash due to something simple as a dangling symlink is
pretty bad imho.
2014-03-27 5:18 GMT+01:00 Michael Biebl :
> There is an interesting bug which can be used to crash sys
There is an interesting bug which can be used to crash systemd via a
dangling symlink. For details please see [0].
To trigger the bug, you need a socket activated service. I'm using
cups in this case.
The steps to reproduce are
a/ Make sure cups.socket is properly configured and in state active (
