On 28/02/14 00:24 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 27.02.14 15:35, Vincent Batts (vba...@redhat.com) wrote:
I see that despite --enable-static listed as a ./configure flag, it is
not supported. Can we get a Makefile target for compiling the
systemd-socket-proxyd as statically linked? Fo
On Thu, 27.02.14 15:35, Vincent Batts (vba...@redhat.com) wrote:
> I see that despite --enable-static listed as a ./configure flag, it is
> not supported. Can we get a Makefile target for compiling the
> systemd-socket-proxyd as statically linked? For it to be portable for
> any guest container.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Vincent Batts wrote:
> Can we get a Makefile target for compiling the
> systemd-socket-proxyd as statically linked? For it to be portable for
> any guest container.
I think that would be neat. While I wrote much of that proxy, I'm not
versed well enough on linkin
El 27/02/14 17:35, Vincent Batts escribió:
I see that despite --enable-static listed as a ./configure flag, it is
not supported. Can we get a Makefile target for compiling the
systemd-socket-proxyd as statically linked? For it to be portable for
any guest container.
static linking will not offe
I see that despite --enable-static listed as a ./configure flag, it is
not supported. Can we get a Makefile target for compiling the
systemd-socket-proxyd as statically linked? For it to be portable for
any guest container.
Take care,
vb
pgpdy2yt5pm0C.pgp
Description: PGP signature
