Re: [systemd-devel] syslog.socket vs. syslog.service

2011-01-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 03.12.10 15:19, Marius Tolzmann (tolzm...@molgen.mpg.de) wrote: > > hi.. > > i have configured a syslog.service which works well.. > > but the syslog.socket which activated systemd-kmsg-syslog.service is > still active and running.. the socket does not activate the service > anymore but

Re: [systemd-devel] syslog.socket vs. syslog.service

2010-12-03 Thread Marius Tolzmann
hi.. how is this supposed to be configured correctly.. since i think i need the systemd-kmsg-syslog as long as my syslog.service ist not running and able to write its logfiles to the filesystem.. ?? > If I understood correctly the kmsg-syslog thing just gets all the messages from kmsg and put

Re: [systemd-devel] syslog.socket vs. syslog.service

2010-12-03 Thread enaut
On 03.12.2010 14:19, Marius Tolzmann wrote: hi.. i have configured a syslog.service which works well.. but the syslog.socket which activated systemd-kmsg-syslog.service is still active and running.. the socket does not activate the service anymore but it is still listed as listening.. The s

[systemd-devel] syslog.socket vs. syslog.service

2010-12-03 Thread Marius Tolzmann
hi.. i have configured a syslog.service which works well.. but the syslog.socket which activated systemd-kmsg-syslog.service is still active and running.. the socket does not activate the service anymore but it is still listed as listening.. how is this supposed to be configured correctly..