On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Sven Anders wrote:
> I'm experiencing a problem with systemd-cgls while testing systemd.
>
> I run systemd for tests on a small KVM VM with ~700MB RAM and no swap.
>
> If I execute the "systemd-cgls" command, I see the tree but without
> the command lines of the ex
Am 10.05.2012 14:45, schrieb Sven Anders:
> Hello!
>
> I'm experiencing a problem with systemd-cgls while testing systemd.
>
> I run systemd for tests on a small KVM VM with ~700MB RAM and no swap.
>
> If I execute the "systemd-cgls" command, I see the tree but without
> the command lines of the
On 05/10/2012 11:30 PM, Sven Anders wrote:
What I find curious is, that it reads the correct command line and then opens
the
/proc file again, but this time it fails. What happened to the first read?
The first read is from is_kernel_thread().
The second read is from show_pid_array() -> get_pro
Am 10.05.2012 22:33, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
> On 05/10/2012 02:45 PM, Sven Anders wrote:
>> If I execute the "systemd-cgls" command, I see the tree but without
>> the command lines of the executables. I only see "n/a".
>
>> open("/proc/300/cmdline", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = 7
>> mmap2(NU
On 05/10/2012 02:45 PM, Sven Anders wrote:
If I execute the "systemd-cgls" command, I see the tree but without
the command lines of the executables. I only see "n/a".
open("/proc/300/cmdline", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE|O_CLOEXEC) = 7
mmap2(NULL, 1075859456, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANO
Hello!
I'm experiencing a problem with systemd-cgls while testing systemd.
I run systemd for tests on a small KVM VM with ~700MB RAM and no swap.
If I execute the "systemd-cgls" command, I see the tree but without
the command lines of the executables. I only see "n/a".
Example:
└ system
├ 1
