Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2022 6:10 AM
To: Ulrich Windl ;
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; antli...@youngman.org.uk
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] [systemddevel]
systemdtmpfiles: behavior of clean
By this logic, the '--clean' option shouldn't exi
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; antli...@youngman.org.uk
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [systemd-devel] Antw: Re: Antw: [EXT] [systemddevel]
systemdtmpfiles: behavior of clean
>>> Wols Lists schrieb am 31.08.2022 um 09:25
>>> in
Nachricht <6c25970f-c7cb-2728-a827-1452e1937...@you
>>> Wols Lists schrieb am 31.08.2022 um 09:25 in
Nachricht <6c25970f-c7cb-2728-a827-1452e1937...@youngman.org.uk>:
> On 31/08/2022 07:16, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>>> 'tomcat.<>' with other associated files (or directories below this).
>
>> I think with the guideline "clean up your own dirt" there
On 31/08/2022 07:16, Ulrich Windl wrote:
'tomcat.<>' with other associated files (or directories below this).
I think with the guideline "clean up your own dirt" there wouldn't be so much
need for external cleanup if the applications would do a better job. The
application always knows best
>>> SCOTT FIELDS schrieb am 30.08.2022 um 21:15 in
Nachricht
> I'm currently running systemd 219‑78.
>
> I realize there's significant behavior differences in the current release,
> but per the documentation, I take it the behavior of '‑clean' hasn't changed
> in regards to directly specifica
I'm currently running systemd 219-78.
I realize there's significant behavior differences in the current release, but
per the documentation, I take it the behavior of '-clean' hasn't changed in
regards to directly specifications only applying to the directory entry and the
top level files. AKA,