Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 256-rc1

2024-04-26 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fr, 26.04.24 09:49, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Well, people moved off split-usr quite successfully, which is a bigger > > feat than cleaning up the /boot/efi/ mess I'd say. > > > > Fedora is currently merging /usr/bin/ and /usr/sbin/, which I am pretty > > sure is a bigger chang

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 256-rc1

2024-04-26 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fr, 26.04.24 09:47, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > * systemd-gpt-auto-generator will stop generating units for ESP > > > > or > > > > XBOOTLDR partitions if it finds mount entries for or below > > > > the /boot/ > > > > or /efi/ hierarchies in /etc/

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 256-rc1

2024-04-26 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 9:46 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Fr, 26.04.24 10:39, Dan Nicholson (d...@endlessos.org) wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 10:11 AM Adrian Vovk wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps Fedora can be adjusted to follow the BLS's recommended mount > > > points? > > > > The prob

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 256-rc1

2024-04-26 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 9:41 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Do, 25.04.24 18:52, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > * systemd-gpt-auto-generator will stop generating units for ESP or > > > XBOOTLDR partitions if it finds mount entries for or below the > > > /boot

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 256-rc1

2024-04-26 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fr, 26.04.24 10:39, Dan Nicholson (d...@endlessos.org) wrote: > On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 10:11 AM Adrian Vovk wrote: > > > > Perhaps Fedora can be adjusted to follow the BLS's recommended mount points? > > The problem with all of these type of "we've realized a better way and > the old way is o

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 256-rc1

2024-04-26 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 25.04.24 18:52, Neal Gompa (ngomp...@gmail.com) wrote: > > * systemd-gpt-auto-generator will stop generating units for ESP or > > XBOOTLDR partitions if it finds mount entries for or below the > > /boot/ > > or /efi/ hierarchies in /etc/fstab. This is to prevent

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 256-rc1

2024-04-26 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 10:11 AM Adrian Vovk wrote: > > Perhaps Fedora can be adjusted to follow the BLS's recommended mount points? The problem with all of these type of "we've realized a better way and the old way is obsolete" is that it's left as someone else's issue to actually change existin

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 256-rc1

2024-04-26 Thread Adrian Vovk
systemd has been recommending against an arrangement like that for a long time now. These partitions are often fragile (read from bootloader code, or worse firmware! VFAT has no data integrity), and they really have no reason to be mounted unless they're about to be accessed. Stacking the mount poi

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 256-rc1

2024-04-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 6:15 PM systemd tag bot wrote: > > A new systemd ☠️ pre-release ☠️ has just been tagged. Please download the > tarball here: > > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/archive/v256-rc1.tar.gz > > NOTE: This is ☠️ pre-release ☠️ software. Do not run this on production >

[systemd-devel] systemd prerelease 256-rc1

2024-04-25 Thread systemd tag bot
A new systemd ☠️ pre-release ☠️ has just been tagged. Please download the tarball here: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/archive/v256-rc1.tar.gz NOTE: This is ☠️ pre-release ☠️ software. Do not run this on production systems, but please test this and report any issues you find to GitHu