On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 6:28 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Mi, 03.02.21 22:32, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> > It doesn't. It waits indefinitely.
> >
> > [* ] A start job is running for
> > /dev/disk/by-uuid/cf9c9518-45d4-43d6-8a0a-294994c383fa (12min 36s / no
> >
On Mi, 03.02.21 22:32, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:18 AM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mi, 27.01.21 17:19, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible for a udev rule to have a timeout? For example:
> > >
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 10:32 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:18 AM Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mi, 27.01.21 17:19, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible for a udev rule to have a timeout? For example:
> > >
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 7:18 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
> On Mi, 27.01.21 17:19, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
> > Is it possible for a udev rule to have a timeout? For example:
> > /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/64-btrfs.rules
> >
> > This udev rule will wait indefinitely for a
On Mi, 27.01.21 17:19, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> Is it possible for a udev rule to have a timeout? For example:
> /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/64-btrfs.rules
>
> This udev rule will wait indefinitely for a missing device to
> appear.
Hmm, no, that's a mis understaning. "rules"
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 01:32:03AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 1:03 AM Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:19:38PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > >
> > > Next, is it possible to enhance udev so that it can report the number
> > > of devices expected for a
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 1:03 AM Greg KH wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:19:38PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >
> > Next, is it possible to enhance udev so that it can report the number
> > of devices expected for a Btrfs file system? This information is
> > currently in the Btrfs superblock
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:19:38PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> Next, is it possible to enhance udev so that it can report the number
> of devices expected for a Btrfs file system? This information is
> currently in the Btrfs superblock found on each device in the
> num_devices field.
>
Is it possible for a udev rule to have a timeout? For example:
/usr/lib/udev/rules.d/64-btrfs.rules
This udev rule will wait indefinitely for a missing device to appear.
It'd be better if it gives up at some point and drops to a dracut
shell. Is that possible? The only alternative right now is
