On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 28.02.14 14:34, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> If you stop LL state machine and start again, then you will go through
>> >> the probe/announce/defe
On Fri, 28.02.14 14:34, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> >
> >> If you stop LL state machine and start again, then you will go through
> >> the probe/announce/defend process anyways. Tell you the truth I didn't
> >> quite unde
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
>
>> If you stop LL state machine and start again, then you will go through
>> the probe/announce/defend process anyways. Tell you the truth I didn't
>> quite understand your question.
>
> Well, in embedded environments (unlike on mobile/d
On Fri, 28.02.14 09:05, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
> > Hmm, how is this hooked up in detail? i.e. when is the IPv4LL state machine
> > started? I think I'd like to see this started after a short while when no
> > DHCP
> > response is seen, and immediately stopped as so
On Fri, 28.02.14 09:17, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
> > > +} else if (ll->state == IPV4LL_STATE_WAITING_PROBE ||
> > > + ll->state == IPV4LL_STATE_PROBING ||
> > > + ll->state ==
> > > + IPV4LL_STATE_WAI
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
>> If an IPv4LL address has been acquired, and then a DHCP server becomes
>> available, do we really want to drop the address entirely? At least for
>> IPv6 there's this concept of "deprecated" addresses for this purpose. I am
>> prett
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl]
> Sent: den 28 februari 2014 04:08
> To: Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] sd-dhcp: i
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:lenn...@poettering.net]
> Sent: den 28 februari 2014 00:56
> To: Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] sd-dhcp: impleme
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 09:54:17PM +0100, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> Implements IPv4LL with respect to RFC 3927
> (http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3927.txt) and integrates it
> with networkd. Majority of the IPv4LL state machine is
> taken from avahi (http://avahi.org/) project's autoip.
>
> IPv
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:28 PM, David Timothy Strauss
wrote:
> This is a lot of code, and this approach is largely obsoleted by
> link-local IPv6 addressing, which also has the benefits of being
> simpler, deterministic (at least with RFC 4862), and collision-proof.
> Both Apple [1] and Microsof
On Thu, 27.02.14 14:28, David Timothy Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote:
>
> This is a lot of code, and this approach is largely obsoleted by
> link-local IPv6 addressing, which also has the benefits of being
> simpler, deterministic (at least with RFC 4862), and collision-proof.
> Both Appl
On Thu, 27.02.14 21:54, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
> Implements IPv4LL with respect to RFC 3927
> (http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3927.txt) and integrates it
> with networkd. Majority of the IPv4LL state machine is
> taken from avahi (http://avahi.org/) project's autoip.
This is a lot of code, and this approach is largely obsoleted by
link-local IPv6 addressing, which also has the benefits of being
simpler, deterministic (at least with RFC 4862), and collision-proof.
Both Apple [1] and Microsoft [2] prefer IPv6 link-local as the best
practice.
Is it really that im
13 matches
Mail list logo
