On Sat, 25.04.15 15:51, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote:
Yeah, patches like these always do end up looking messy. It's much
easier to read after applying it.
Well, it jumps from one boot to the next boot using _BOOT_ID matches. It
starts at the journal head to get the boot ID, makes a
On 2015-04-08 16:14, Jan Janssen wrote:
On 2015-04-08 14:39, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 02.04.15 17:08, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote:
This method should greatly improve offset based lookup. We now don't
have
to aggregate the full boot listing just so we can jump to a specific
On Thu, 02.04.15 17:08, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote:
This method should greatly improve offset based lookup. We now don't have
to aggregate the full boot listing just so we can jump to a specific position,
which can be a real pain on big journals just for a mere -b -1 case.
As an
On 2015-04-08 14:39, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 02.04.15 17:08, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote:
This method should greatly improve offset based lookup. We now don't have
to aggregate the full boot listing just so we can jump to a specific position,
which can be a real pain on big
