Re: [systemd-devel] Delegate= on slice before v237

2019-02-15 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mi, 13.02.19 11:52, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@gmail.com) wrote: > > The fact it wasn't refused outright was an > > accident, and because it was one I am not entirely sure what the > > precise effect of allowing it was. However, I am pretty sure it at > > least had two effects: > > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Delegate= on slice before v237

2019-02-13 Thread Filipe Brandenburger via systemd-devel
Hey Lennart, Thanks for the clarification. On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 2:17 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 11.02.19 16:39, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@google.com) wrote: > > Before systemd v237 (when Delegate= was no longer allowed on slice > > units)... Did setting Delegate=yes on a

Re: [systemd-devel] Delegate= on slice before v237

2019-02-12 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mo, 11.02.19 16:39, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@google.com) wrote: > Hi Lennart, heya! > Before systemd v237 (when Delegate= was no longer allowed on slice > units)... Did setting Delegate=yes on a slice have *any* effect at all? > > Or did it just do nothing (and a slice with