On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 4:35 AM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> While we do support binaries that stay running from the initrd, it's
> typically something I'd suggest people to avoid, and if they do it
> anyway, then at least only for a short time (i.e. terminate once boot
> is complete or so)
In cas
On Mi, 25.09.24 21:06, Brian Masney (bmas...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 03:53:36PM +, dharm...@microchip.com wrote:
> > yes something similar to this, I will experiment this and get back to you.
> >
> > and I think since the egt service and its libraries depend on the full
>
On Di, 24.09.24 15:26, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:33 PM wrote:
>
> > Hi Team,
> >
> > I'm exploring the possibility of splitting the systemd binary to
> > optimize boot time before and after switching to the root filesystem.
> >
> > I’m aware that the
On Mo, 23.09.24 09:33, dharm...@microchip.com (dharm...@microchip.com) wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I'm exploring the possibility of splitting the systemd binary to
> optimize boot time before and after switching to the root
> filesystem.
"the systemd binary"? There are a lot more than one...
> I’m awa
Hi Brian,
On 26/09/24 6:36 am, Brian Masney wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 03:53:36PM +, dharm...@microchip.com wrote:
>> yes something similar to this, I will experiment this and get back to yo
On Thu, Sep 26, 2024 at 06:43:40AM +, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> Have you discussed moving cntvct-log to systemd-analyze? IMHO, systemd
> can have better control when the target is reached to record the wall
> time.
No that doesn't make sense right now because cntvct looks at specific
har
: dharm...@microchip.com
Cc: sereni...@inventati.org ,
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] Exploring Minimal Systemd in Initramfs for Faster
Boot
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 03:53:36PM +, dharm...@microchip.com wrote:
> yes something similar to this, I will experim
On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 03:53:36PM +, dharm...@microchip.com wrote:
> yes something similar to this, I will experiment this and get back to you.
>
> and I think since the egt service and its libraries depend on the full
> rootfs, integrating initramfs might not provide significant benefits in
Hi Serenissi,
Thanks for your valuable comments.
> which means you won't be able to run egt in initfamfs until main rootfs
> is mounted anyways?
Yes, egt depends on libraries and examples under /usr/share in rootfs.
> In theory you can use RootImage to point to /sysroot and start egt after
>
If you want to keep the egt service running from early initramfs into
the new roootfs then see https://systemd.io/ROOT_STORAGE_DAEMONS
> Since systemd v255, alternatively the SurviveFinalKillSignal=yes unit
option can be set
If the egt service can work very early in main rootfs then you can a
Hi Serenissi,
On 24/09/24 2:58 pm, serenissi wrote:
> du -sh /usr/lib/systemd/
> 13M /usr/lib/systemd/
>
> du -sh /usr/lib64/systemd
> 6.4M /usr/lib64/systemd
>
> i.e. about 20M with most stuffs of systemd package installed. Is it too
> large for initrd? Idk about your setup, might be em
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:33 PM wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I'm exploring the possibility of splitting the systemd binary to
> optimize boot time before and after switching to the root filesystem.
>
> I’m aware that the systemd binary is quite large and may not fit in the
> initramfs, but is it feasib
Are you aware that tools like mkosi already generate initrds which run
systemd? And systemd already has the logic to let services survive the
pivot_root (though that is discouraged and you should better use fdstore to
pass existing state to a new instance of the service).
Cheers, Nils
On Mon, Sep
du -sh /usr/lib/systemd/
13M /usr/lib/systemd/
du -sh /usr/lib64/systemd
6.4M /usr/lib64/systemd
i.e. about 20M with most stuffs of systemd package installed. Is it too
large for initrd? Idk about your setup, might be embedded flash..
On 9/23/24 12:03, dharm...@microchip.com wrote:
Hi
14 matches
Mail list logo